Automated vs Manual Pentesting?
The cybersecurity space has seen a rise in what experts call the "checking the box" approach to penetration testing (pentesting). Turning what is still a manual solution into an automated one; then packaging the final product as the same thing.
Many vendors now automate common attack paths—like basic path traversal or default credential checks—and label the output as a "pentest." Some even add AI-driven reconnaissance to simulate depth, but the core remains shallow and predictable.
Manual pentesting, on the other hand, involves real humans identifying misconfigurations, chaining vulnerabilities, testing business logic flaws, and going beyond canned scripts. It's not about checking boxes—it’s about thinking like an attacker and acting like an actual auditor.
The Rise of Automated Pentesting
As automated pentest tools become more common, MSPs are being sold the idea that faster equals better. But frameworks like PCI DSS, HIPAA, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 increasingly emphasize real-world attack simulation—something these tools can’t replicate. Without human creativity, manual chaining, and true risk context, these platforms fall short of both security and compliance.
The "Check the Box" Approach
For SMBs and MSPs, automated scans may seem like a budget-friendly win. Pentesting isn’t just about checking a box—it’s about proving you did your due diligence. If a data breach hits and you’re stuck defending a SaaS scan from an AI agent, good luck. HIPAA and PCI DSS both expect deeper testing, and many frameworks require manual testing.
Why Manual Pentesting and Auditing Matters
There’s a gap growing in cybersecurity—between what security engineers test for, what developers actually deploy, what CPAs or auditors expect, and what a business actually needs. Automated tools and AI-based scans can’t replace manual audits and pentesting but instead enhance it. They offer surface-level assessments that miss business logic flaws, edge cases, and the real context behind your infrastructure.
Pentesting is no longer just a security task—it’s a conversation between departments. When you outsource it to AI, you’re not getting an audit. You’re getting another SaaS checkbox that misses the point.
Invest in Manual Testing
While automated and semi-automated solutions may have their place, they shouldn't be a substitute for a manual pentest when it comes to compliance. For a comprehensive security assessment and true peace of mind, a manual pentest from a reputable firm is the best option.
Contact MSP Pentesting today to discuss your specific needs and get a quote for a manual penetration test that will give you the confidence you deserve.
.avif){kind=logo}
.png){kind=spacer}